Key Takeaways
- In B2B negotiations, the first credible price presented can influence how subsequent offers are evaluated.
- Anchoring works by establishing a reference point against which buyers interpret the prices that follow.
- Buyers may continue to negotiate from an initial price even when they know that the starting point was simply an opening position.
- Making the first bid can therefore give a salesperson greater influence over the range in which the negotiation takes place.
- Anchoring becomes more powerful when the initial number is supported by a credible rationale or a meaningful reference point.
- Combining anchoring with loss aversion can shift the buyer’s attention from the price of the solution to the larger cost or risk associated with not buying it.
- Anchoring is not about quoting an arbitrary or inflated number; it is about establishing a reference point that shapes how the buyer evaluates the value of the offer.
For any B2B business, the ability to command a good price is a fundamental driver of profitability. Most businesses would like to sell at a premium that reflects the value they create, while buyers naturally look for opportunities to negotiate that price down. The pressure to close a deal can make it tempting for salespeople to offer a discount when negotiations become difficult, but every reduction in price comes directly out of the economics of the deal and can be particularly costly when margins are already tight. The challenge, therefore, is not simply to win the business, but to protect the value of the offer and avoid reducing the price unnecessarily. This is where understanding how buyers perceive and evaluate prices can give a salesperson an important advantage.
This is where behavioral insights about anchoring becomes relevant to B2B sales. The first credible number can become a reference point for the buyer, influencing how subsequent prices are perceived and evaluated. For a salesperson, this creates an opportunity to shape the negotiation before the buyer has established their own view of what constitutes a reasonable price.
The First Number Becomes a Reference Point
Anchoring is a cognitive bias in which people rely too heavily on information received earlier when making subsequent judgments. The initial information becomes a reference point, and later judgments tend to move around that reference point rather than being formed entirely independently.
The classic demonstration of this effect comes from an experiment by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Participants were shown a spinning wheel that was rigged to stop at either 10 or 65. They were then asked an unrelated question: what percentage of African countries are members of the United Nations? Participants who had seen the wheel stop at 10 gave a median estimate of 25%, while those who had seen it stop at 65 gave a median estimate of 45%. The number produced by the wheel was entirely random, yet it influenced the participants’ subsequent estimates.
The important point is not that people believed the wheel was providing useful information. They knew the outcome was random, but the number still affected their judgment. The initial number established an intuitive starting point from which subsequent estimates were made.
This same tendency can appear in B2B negotiations, where buyers rarely have complete information about what a supplier considers an acceptable price. When the supplier presents the first credible price, that number can become the reference point around which the negotiation develops.
The First Bid Shapes the Negotiation
Stephen Leider and William Lovejoy studied bargaining between firms in a simulated multi-tier supply chain and found a significant anchoring effect in negotiations between businesses. The first bid had a meaningful influence on the final negotiated price, suggesting that the opening offer can shape the range within which subsequent bargaining takes place.
This has an important implication for B2B salespeople because negotiations are characterized by incomplete information. A buyer may know what they would ideally like to pay, but they usually do not know the supplier’s true minimum acceptable price. The supplier, in turn, may not know the maximum the buyer is prepared to pay.
The first credible number therefore does more than communicate a price. It can establish the reference point from which the buyer begins to evaluate subsequent offers. If a supplier quotes $1,000 per unit and the buyer negotiates the price down to $900, the buyer may feel that they have achieved a meaningful concession. If the supplier had initially quoted $800, however, the same negotiation could have unfolded around a substantially lower range.
The buyer’s perception of a successful negotiation is therefore influenced not only by the final price but also by the starting point against which that price is compared. This behavioral insight can be used very effectively by B2B Sales and Marketing folks to close deals at the price levels they want.
A $1,000 Anchor Can Change the Negotiation
Consider a supplier selling an industrial component that could reasonably be offered at different prices depending on volume, configuration and service requirements. The salesperson begins the negotiation by quoting $1,000 per unit. The buyer pushes back and eventually negotiates the supplier down to $900 per unit.
From the buyer’s perspective, the final price may feel like a successful outcome because it represents a $100 reduction from the original quote. The $1,000 figure has provided the reference point against which the $900 price is evaluated.
Had the salesperson started the negotiation at $800 per unit, however, the buyer’s expectations would have been established around a very different reference point. Even if the salesperson eventually agreed to $800, the buyer would have had less reason to consider a $900 price attractive. The salesperson is therefore not simply negotiating the price. They are influencing the range within which the buyer conducts the negotiation.
Anchoring Works Best When the Number Is Credible
The practical implication is not that B2B salespeople should simply put an artificially high number into every proposal. An anchor has to be sufficiently credible to function as a meaningful reference point.
A supplier that quotes $1,000 for a solution that buyers know is normally available for $500 is unlikely to create a useful anchor. Instead, the number may damage the supplier’s credibility and encourage the buyer to challenge the entire proposal. The more complex the purchase, the more important it becomes to connect the initial price to something the buyer can understand and evaluate.
This is particularly relevant for solutions where the price is not determined by a single market-standard figure. Consulting engagements, industrial systems, technology platforms and engineered solutions often involve significant variation in scope and configuration. In such situations, the supplier has greater scope to establish a reference point through the way the proposal is structured and presented.
The salesperson can therefore establish the initial number before the buyer has anchored themselves to a different figure. The objective is not to prevent negotiation, but to make the negotiation take place within a range that is more favorable to the supplier.
Combining Anchoring with Loss Aversion Principle
Loss aversion refers to the tendency for people to experience losses more strongly than equivalent gains. Losing something they already have, for example, can feel more significant than gaining something of equal value. This means that the way a salesperson frames the consequences of a decision can influence how the buyer evaluates the offer.
Instead of presenting the price in isolation, the salesperson can establish a reference point around the potential consequences of not making the purchase. This is particularly relevant in B2B sales because many solutions are designed not only to create benefits, but also to prevent costly problems. The buyer may therefore evaluate the purchase very differently depending on whether they are thinking about what they will gain by buying the solution or what they could lose by not buying it.
Imagine a supplier selling a security solution to a business that faces the possibility of a major security incident. The salesperson could simply present the solution as a $15,000 investment. In that case, the buyer’s attention is likely to focus on the $15,000 price and whether the solution is worth that amount.
The same proposal can be framed differently by first establishing the potential financial consequence of a security incident. The salesperson might explain that a major incident could create a liability of $2–5 million, before presenting the $15,000 investment required for protection. The $15,000 price is now being evaluated against a very different reference point. The buyer is no longer considering only whether the solution is worth $15,000. They are also considering what they could stand to lose by not having it.
This is where anchoring and loss aversion work together. The potential $2–5 million liability provides a reference point, while loss aversion makes the potential loss more psychologically salient. The $15,000 investment can consequently appear more reasonable when evaluated against the consequence that it is intended to prevent.
The same principle can be applied to many B2B sales situations. A maintenance solution can be positioned against the cost of prolonged downtime, a quality system against the cost of defects and recalls, and a consulting engagement against the financial consequences of continuing with an inefficient process. In each case, the salesperson is helping the buyer evaluate the price against a more consequential reference point.
The Negotiation Begins Before the Buyer Makes an Offer
Anchoring is particularly useful because B2B salespeople often think of negotiation as beginning when the buyer makes a counteroffer. In reality, the buyer may already have begun forming their expectations as soon as they encounter the supplier’s first price, estimate or value statement.
The first credible number can influence what the buyer considers expensive, reasonable or attractive. It can also affect how subsequent concessions are perceived, because a reduction from a higher starting point can feel more significant than the same final price reached from a lower starting point.
For salespeople, this means that the opening proposal deserves more strategic attention than it often receives. The question is not simply, “What price should we quote?” It is also, “What reference point do we want the buyer to use when evaluating that price?”
Anchoring does not eliminate the importance of product value, competitive alternatives or the buyer’s budget, and it cannot turn an unacceptable offer into an acceptable one. What it can do is influence the psychological starting point from which the buyer evaluates the economics of the deal.
In B2B sales, where negotiations often involve incomplete information and considerable room for interpretation, establishing that starting point can make a meaningful difference to the final outcome. A salesperson who understands anchoring is therefore not simply presenting a price; they are helping determine the frame within which that price will be judged.
Discover new, powerful, research-backed behavioral insights that transform B2B Sales and Marketing with our B2B Influence Strategy Masterclass.
My experience suggests the anchor needs to be somewhat realistic for the specific product line. Sometimes a wildly high figure can actually push a buyer away entirely.